Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Dragon Ranger Gaming (-2.5) vs TEC Esports (+2.5)

No recent headlines matched this market. We only show an article when the names in the question appear in its headline, so a very local or very new market often has nothing. Showing nothing is deliberate: an unrelated story here would read like evidence about the price.

Headlines are matched on the names in “Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Dragon Ranger Gaming (-2.5) vs TEC Es…”. Nobody checks them by hand, so one may not be relevant. They also say nothing about whether the price has already moved on this news.

How this market resolves

This market refers to the Valorant match between Dragon Ranger Gaming and TEC Esports in the VCT China Stage 2 Play-Ins, initially scheduled for August 10 at 6:00AM ET. This market is decided solely by the round score of Map 1 of this match, and is independent of which team wins Map 1 or the overall match. This market will resolve to "Dragon Ranger Gaming" if Dragon Ranger Gaming wins Map 1 by 3 or more rounds, including any overtime (i.e. Dragon Ranger Gaming's round total on Map 1 exceeds TEC Esports's by 3 or more). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "TEC Esports". Map 1 must be played to completion, with a final round score determined by rounds actually played, for this market to resolve to a team. If Map 1 is completed in this way, the market resolves on that round score regardless of how the remainder of the match concludes (including any later forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default). If Map 1 is not played at all, is not played to completion, or is decided by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default rather than by rounds played to a conclusion, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without Map 1 being completed, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead, including video evidence.

Source: https://vlr.gg