Set Handicap: Arseneault (-1.5) vs Farzam (+1.5)
BUY YES
- Cost
- 37.0¢
- Implied chance
- 37.0%
- Return if right
- 170.3%
- Spread cost
- 12%
If you put in $100
You get 270.3 shares at 37.0¢ each.
YES wins: $270.27 back, a profit of $170.27. YES loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $23.85 of that profit. Without it you would make $194.12.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy YES on Polymarket
BUY NO
- Cost
- 69.0¢
- Implied chance
- 69.0%
- Return if right
- 44.9%
- Spread cost
- 13%
If you put in $100
You get 144.9 shares at 69.0¢ each.
NO wins: $144.93 back, a profit of $44.93. NO loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $6.59 of that profit. Without it you would make $51.52.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy NO on Polymarket
- Set Handicap: Arseneault (-1.5) …50.0%
- ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign…48.0%
- ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Match O/U 21.549.5%
- ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 1 Winner50.0%
- ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Match O/U 22.550.0%
- Set Handicap: Farzam (-1.5) vs A…50.0%
Latest: Aug 26, 03:22 PM4 further outcomes not shown
Latest news
headlines link to their publishersNo recent headlines matched this market. We only show an article when the names in the question appear in its headline, so a very local or very new market often has nothing. Showing nothing is deliberate: an unrelated story here would read like evidence about the price.
Headlines are matched on the names in “Set Handicap: Arseneault (-1.5) vs Farzam (+1.5)”. Nobody checks them by hand, so one may not be relevant. They also say nothing about whether the price has already moved on this news.
How this market resolves
This market refers to the tennis match between Mikael Arseneault and Matisse Farzam in the ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard, originally scheduled for August 26, 2026 at 10:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Arseneault" if Mikael Arseneault wins by 2 or more sets than Matisse Farzam, based on the final completed score. Otherwise, it will resolve to "Farzam." If the match begins but is not completed due to retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve 50-50, unless the outcome of this market has already been unconditionally determined by the completed portion of play. For example, if the deciding set has begun when the match ends, Mikael Arseneault can no longer win by 2 or more sets, and this market will resolve to "Farzam." If the match is canceled before play begins, or a result has not been determined by September 9, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve 50-50. Resolution will be based on official ITF results.
Source: https://www.itftennis.com/en/tournament-calendar/
Other outcomes in ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault
ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Match O/U 21.5
Set 1 Winner: Farzam vs Arseneault
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Match O/U 22.5
Set Handicap: Farzam (-1.5) vs Arseneault (+1.5)
Matisse Farzam vs. Mikael Arseneault: Total Sets O/U 2.5
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5
ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Completed Match: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Match O/U 23.5
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5
Set 2 Winner: Farzam vs Arseneault
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5
Farzam vs. Arseneault: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5