Set Handicap: Ribeiro (-1.5) vs Marcos (+1.5)
BUY YES
- Cost
- 99.0¢
- Implied chance
- 99.0%
- Return if right
- 1.0%
- Spread cost
- 99%
If you put in $100
You get 101.0 shares at 99.0¢ each.
YES wins: $101.01 back, a profit of $1.01. YES loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $98.99 of that profit. Without it you would make $100.00.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy YES on Polymarket
BUY NO
- Cost
- 99.0¢
- Implied chance
- 99.0%
- Return if right
- 1.0%
- Spread cost
- 99%
If you put in $100
You get 101.0 shares at 99.0¢ each.
NO wins: $101.01 back, a profit of $1.01. NO loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $98.99 of that profit. Without it you would make $100.00.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy NO on Polymarket
- Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro Set Handicap +/-1.550.0%
- Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Edu…51.5%
- Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro Match O/U 22.550.0%
- Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro Set 2 O/U 8.550.0%
- Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro Set 2 O/U 10.550.0%
- Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro Set 1 O/U 8.550.0%
Latest: Aug 31, 09:24 PM4 further outcomes not shown
Latest news
headlines link to their publishers- Cronenberg Meets Activism in Victor Di Marco and Márcio Picoli’s Queer BDSM Drama ‘London’Variety · 4d ago
- Pampa Energía Founder Marcos Mindlin Buys 675,000 Shares for $2.3 Million. What Does This Mean for Investors?Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- ‘Seduction,’ Helmed by Zelito Viana and Marcos Palmeira, to Premiere at the Inffinito Fest in Miami (EXCLUSIVE)Variety · 8d ago
- Marco’s Pizza’s largest franchisee acquires five more storesYahoo Finance · 13d ago
- Locarno: Marco Cavazzin’s ‘Mutrion,’ Set in the Venice Lagoon, Scoops Leopards of Tomorrow Director AwardVariety · 16d ago
- Marco Rubio's perfect weekend will make the left faint, Danica Patrick enjoys the view & angry Mike Vrabel!Fox News · 17d ago
Headlines are matched on the names in “Set Handicap: Ribeiro (-1.5) vs Marcos (+1.5)”. Nobody checks them by hand, so one may not be relevant. They also say nothing about whether the price has already moved on this news.
How this market resolves
This market refers to the tennis match between Eduardo Ribeiro and Pedro Vives Marcos in the Porto, originally scheduled for September 1, 2026 at 10:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Ribeiro" if Eduardo Ribeiro wins by 2 or more sets than Pedro Vives Marcos, based on the final completed score. Otherwise, it will resolve to "Marcos." If the match begins but is not completed due to retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve 50-50, unless the outcome of this market has already been unconditionally determined by the completed portion of play. For example, if the deciding set has begun when the match ends, Eduardo Ribeiro can no longer win by 2 or more sets, and this market will resolve to "Marcos." If the match is canceled before play begins, or a result has not been determined by September 15, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve 50-50. Resolution will be based on official Challenger results.
Source: https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current
Other outcomes in Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro
Porto: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Match O/U 22.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Match O/U 21.5
Marcos vs. Ribeiro: Match O/U 23.5
Set 2 Winner: Marcos vs Ribeiro
Pedro Vives Marcos vs. Eduardo Ribeiro: Total Sets O/U 2.5
Porto: Completed Match: Pedro Vives Marcos vs Eduardo Ribeiro
Set 1 Winner: Marcos vs Ribeiro
Set Handicap: Marcos (-1.5) vs Ribeiro (+1.5)