Set 2 Winner: Heck vs Rottgering
BUY YES
- Cost
- 28.0¢
- Implied chance
- 28.0%
- Return if right
- 257.1%
- Spread cost
- 12%
If you put in $100
You get 357.1 shares at 28.0¢ each.
YES wins: $357.14 back, a profit of $257.14. YES loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $35.01 of that profit. Without it you would make $292.16.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy YES on Polymarket
BUY NO
- Cost
- 77.0¢
- Implied chance
- 77.0%
- Return if right
- 29.9%
- Spread cost
- 13%
If you put in $100
You get 129.9 shares at 77.0¢ each.
NO wins: $129.87 back, a profit of $29.87. NO loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $4.36 of that profit. Without it you would make $34.23.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy NO on Polymarket
- Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering Set 2 Winner25.0%
- Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering Set 1 O/U 8.566.0%
- Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering Set Handicap +/-1.562.0%
- Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering Set 1 O/U 10.521.5%
- Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering Total Sets: O/U 2.528.0%
- Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering Set 1 Winner25.0%
Latest: Aug 22, 12:35 PM4 further outcomes not shown
Latest news
headlines link to their publishersNo recent headlines matched this market. We only show an article when the names in the question appear in its headline, so a very local or very new market often has nothing. Showing nothing is deliberate: an unrelated story here would read like evidence about the price.
Headlines are matched on the names in “Set 2 Winner: Heck vs Rottgering”. Nobody checks them by hand, so one may not be relevant. They also say nothing about whether the price has already moved on this news.
How this market resolves
This market refers to the tennis match between Hunter Heck and Mees Rottgering in the Winston-Salem Open, Qualification, originally scheduled for August 22, 2026 at 12:30PM ET. This market will resolve to “Heck” if Hunter Heck wins set 2. It will resolve to “Rottgering” if Mees Rottgering wins set 2. If the match begins but set 2 is not completed with a winner determined (including the match ending before set 2 is reached), this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or play has not begun by September 5, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve 50-50. Resolution will be based on official ATP match statistics.
Source: https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current
Other outcomes in Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering
Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering
Set Handicap: Rottgering (-1.5) vs Heck (+1.5)
Hunter Heck vs. Mees Rottgering: Total Sets O/U 2.5
Set 1 Winner: Heck vs Rottgering
Heck vs. Rottgering: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5
Winston-Salem Open, Qualification: Completed Match: Hunter Heck vs Mees Rottgering
Heck vs. Rottgering: Match O/U 21.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Match O/U 22.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Match O/U 23.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5
Heck vs. Rottgering: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5