Set 1 Winner: Fearnley vs McDonald
BUY YES
- Cost
- 99.0¢
- Implied chance
- 99.0%
- Return if right
- 1.0%
- Spread cost
- 99%
If you put in $100
You get 101.0 shares at 99.0¢ each.
YES wins: $101.01 back, a profit of $1.01. YES loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $98.99 of that profit. Without it you would make $100.00.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy YES on Polymarket
BUY NO
- Cost
- 99.0¢
- Implied chance
- 99.0%
- Return if right
- 1.0%
- Spread cost
- 99%
If you put in $100
You get 101.0 shares at 99.0¢ each.
NO wins: $101.01 back, a profit of $1.01. NO loses: $0.00, and the whole $100 is gone.
The gap between buyers and sellers takes $98.99 of that profit. Without it you would make $100.00.
Assumes the whole order fills at this price. A large order eats into the book and averages worse.
Buy NO on Polymarket
- Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald Set 1 Winner50.0%
- Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs M…63.0%
- Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald Set 2 Winner50.0%
- Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald Set 2 O/U 8.550.0%
- Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald Match O/U 21.550.0%
- Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald Set 2 O/U 9.550.0%
Latest: Aug 18, 09:00 AM4 further outcomes not shown
Latest news
headlines link to their publishers- McDonald’s Keeps Cratering: Why One Bullish Analyst Says 50% Gains Lie AheadYahoo Finance · 21h ago
- A McDonald’s provides normalcy in Ukraine and actor Hayden Panettiere dies: Morning RundownNBC News · 22h ago
- Missed shifts were costly to this McDonald's. An app has fixed the problemNPR · 1d ago
- ‘Running out of money’: Kraft, McDonald’s, Whirlpool CEOs all flag same concern over US consumers — protect your wealthYahoo Finance · 2d ago
- Jim Cramer Breaks Down McDonald’s (MCD) Q2 Earnings and Execution FlawsYahoo Finance · 2d ago
- RFK Jr. says he's seen 'boxes and boxes' of McDonald's on Trump planeThe Hill · 4d ago
Headlines are matched on the names in “Set 1 Winner: Fearnley vs McDonald”. Nobody checks them by hand, so one may not be relevant. They also say nothing about whether the price has already moved on this news.
How this market resolves
This market refers to the tennis match between Jacob Fearnley and Mackenzie McDonald in the Quebec City, originally scheduled for August 18, 2026 at 11:00AM ET. This market will resolve to “Fearnley” if Jacob Fearnley wins the first set. It will resolve to “McDonald” if Mackenzie McDonald wins the first set. If the match begins but is not completed, and the first set is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on that completed set. If the first set is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. Resolution will be based on official Challenger match statistics.
Source: https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current
Other outcomes in Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald
Quebec City: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Match O/U 21.5
Set 2 Winner: Fearnley vs McDonald
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Match O/U 22.5
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Match O/U 23.5
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5
Jacob Fearnley vs. Mackenzie McDonald: Total Sets O/U 2.5
Quebec City: Completed Match: Jacob Fearnley vs Mackenzie McDonald
Set Handicap: McDonald (-1.5) vs Fearnley (+1.5)
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5
Set Handicap: Fearnley (-1.5) vs McDonald (+1.5)
Fearnley vs. McDonald: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5